Speaker 1
The U.S. Government
has reconsidered its arguments regarding the topic climate change since the
number of hurricanes that perform their dance in California increases from year
to year, and scientists everywhere assess unusual weather events. In the past,
it always had been said that there was no evidence for a relationship between
air pollution and global warming. Now, in the US Action Report 2002, they
simply recommend to get used to the unavoidable
results of the climate warming. One may have difficulties with the
recommendation of the U.S. Government presumably to calmness in China where
currently 10 million people are threatened by high tides. Due to the air
pollution, the rhythm of the monsoon rain has changed, according to the UNO.
More and more inundations in the region are the consequence. Already 1,000
people have drowned in China alone within the last weeks. Environmental
protection organizations push to quick action in the area of climate
protection. Discussions about to which extent mankind boosts the warming are a
waste of time. One must no longer be able to frivolously disregard the storms,
inundations or droughts.
Speaker 2
These are
quite clear signs that something rapidly changes. The erratic weather events,
the storms, for example Lothar in Central Europe some years ago, and now these
inundations arrive with a higher frequency. In the region of the Alps: I just
recently have been in a valley of the Alps which was concerned very strongly of
avalanche events which no longer had been known this way since more than 50
years. This may happen every 50 years. But, if the event suddenly happens every
tenths year, then this is a sign anyway that something funny happens. And one
must assume that there is a relationship with the global climate change.
Speaker 1
During the latest
UN conference for Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro 10 years ago,
the international community of the Nations agreed that the emergency brake had
to be pulled on. Only the “how” had been left open at this mega-union ennobled
to a top summit with 30,000 participants.
The speeches of the 170 representatives of Nations and Governments at
the time turned out quite non-committal though.
Since Rio,
much valuable time has passed unused. Only a paper mountain remains from the
common program of the Agenda 21 which had been agreed upon. To this day, these
three internationally binding Rio-Conventions on Desertification, on the
Protection of the Biological Diversity and Climate Protection partly not even
have been signed. The quarrel about Climate Protection went into the next round
in the Japanese Kyoto only five years later. In 1997, the Industrial Nations committed
themselves to reduce important greenhouse gases by 5.2 per cent under the level
from 1990 up to the year 2012, at that time. Meanwhile, the Kyoto protocol has
been strongly diluted. The USA, the biggest polluter, even have left last year.
Speaker 2
The primary
failure is at the level of the Governments themselves. The Governments have
approved to these Conventions, actually. And of course, one must differentiate.
There are Governments which still today are struggling quite in public and are
even proud of it like the Americans, with the Bush Administration. This is
actually a very, very serious setback for the Kyoto protocol. We certainly hope
that nevertheless it will be ratified this year, if the Russians and the
Japanese just contribute their consent, so that at least this instrument may
start to exist. Of course, it is by far not adequate to fight the climate
change. But without this international legal framework, there still would
happen even less.
Speaker 1
Air
pollution already has become a noticeable threat in many parts of the world. A layer
of dirt, several kilometers thick, is hanging over Southeast Asia for weeks.
According to the UNO, it reduces the solar radiation up to 15 per cent, entails
harvest failures and is responsible for serious respiratory tract diseases.
At present,
the sun doesn't rise often over the Indian Taj Mahal for days any more. Keyword
desert convention: More than a billion people in 110 countries are threatened
of drought and progressive desertification meanwhile. Almost two billion people
don't have access to clean drinking water. About two thirds of the agricultural
productive farmlands have withered in the South of Africa which area is particularly
concerned. Drought and mismanagement have taken the region to an almost
hopeless position. 13 million people presumably won't survive in Malawi, Zambia
and other Countries of South Africa without international food help this year.
Not far
away from this crisis region, next week there will be a Summit with the topics Environment
and Development once again. Up to 60,000 delegates will storm the Summit in
Johannesburg. The main emphasis this time: Sustainability. According to UNO
this means to increase the improvement on the quality of life for all people on
the earth without the resource consumption beyond the limits of natural
capacity.
In Johannesburg,
the simple awareness shall gain general acceptance, that all of us sit in the
same boat, to express it briefly; for example, as to the fishing topic, an
economic sector which presently is completely disregarding the criteria of
sustainability. Europe doesn't play an insignificant role in this.
Speaker 2
If we would
be able to modify the existing fishing subsidies, so that no more capacities are
exported to Africa, in particular at the West African coast, in order to empty
the oceans of fish in areas formerly rather rich in fish, where the local
population strongly suffers from this. One actually creates unemployment by
means of European subsidies at the West African coast there, destroying local
old fishing cultures which have used these fish populations in artisanale way. That would be a quite concrete contribution
to the sustainable development of West Africa.
Speaker 1
There are
many hopes that have fallen by the wayside between Rio and Johannesburg. At the celebrations of the completion of the Summit,
ten years ago, children have dug in the earth from 50 nations next to the new
peace monument. However, a compensation between poor and rich countries largely
remained symbolic.